Differences between spider lifts and scaffolding

Differences between spider lifts and scaffolding
 

Advantages of EASTLIFT Spider lift over Scaffolding

 

The main reason for the frequent occurrence of fall-at-height accidents is the unregulated use of scaffolding and other working-at-height tools. At the same time, with the aging of the world, those engaged in construction and other dangerous work are mainly middle-aged and elderly people, thus also bringing safety risks to the working-at-height industry. Compared with traditional tools such as scaffolding, spider lifts can transport people to a designated location through a work-basket, which guarantees the safety of the workforce. Especially with the economic development, large shopping malls, stadiums, railway stations, airports, and other buildings with high interior space structures have emerged, and spider lifts are the perfect alternative to scaffolding, to undertake the task of working at height.

 

1. EASTLIFT spider lifts are more efficient than scaffolding. Scaffolding takes time to build and has to be dismantled at the end of the project, while spider lifts do not need to be dismantled and built, which greatly saves labor costs.

2. EASTLIFT Spider lift is compact and can easily pass through narrow passages. The four legs not only share the pressure on the ground to protect the indoor floor but also are more flexible and safer when working on uneven ground and stairs outdoors.

 

To sum up, EASTLIFT spider lift is safer and cheaper than scaffolding. If you have any questions, please feel free to enquire.